On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:25:37AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Finney <[email protected]> writes: > > > Though there seem to be a number of people vocally wishing Robert > > would go away or the like, I have yet to see any substantive response > > to the questions he's raised in this thread. > > I made a substantive response to these points weeks ago. He just didn't > like it. > > I don't feel the urge to constantly repeat it, but since I'm sending the > mail anyway: the release team made a delegate decision. That decision was > not overridden. Hence, the release continues. All else is irrelevant. > > If he wants to stop the release, he needs to propose a GR to override the > delegate decision, and it has to pass. Neither of those things have > happened. Until they do, this is all pointless noise.
As I said in a separate mail, the developers just discredited this line of reasoning by ranking option 2 above option 4. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
