Bill Allombert <[email protected]> writes: > I proposed my resolution explicitly under 4.1.5, not under 4.1.3. The > purpose of this GR is to take a public stance whether or not the AGPL > meet DFSG. > > I am pretty confident that the FTP master will comply with the outcome > of such determination, and I think it would be uselessly confrontational > to draft it as overriding them.
I believe that you're mistaken in your belief that it's less confrontational to override their decision without saying so. However, I will defer to the FTP team; if they see this distinction and agree with it, I withdraw my objection. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
