MJ Ray wrote: > Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: >> MJ Ray <[email protected]> writes: >>> I hope that others will support this debian and co-op view. >> I continue to object to this GR as currently worded because it is a >> stealth delegate override that doesn't clearly state its implications and >> effects. I encourage all DDs to not second it until it's been fixed, even >> if you agree with the substance. > > Did the delegates decide this particular matter or was Bug #495721 > merely a summary of current practice? The statement there seemed > incomplete in significant ways.
Yes, they did. > Also, I think we should let the secretary to decide if a GR proposal > modifies some foundation document, overrides a delegate decision, or > requires amendment to be valid, rather than withholding seconds. I'm > not that great at bureaucracy, so I think it's better that only the > secretary decides the rules, rather than having every DD try to use > the rule book as a weapon. I think it's wrong to leave the decision on whether a GR proposal modifies a foundation document to the secretary. I do think it's a good idea to request withholding seconds if anything is unclear. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
