On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:31:01PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > MJ Ray <m...@phonecoop.coop> writes: > > > I hope that others will support this debian and co-op view. > > I continue to object to this GR as currently worded because it is a > stealth delegate override that doesn't clearly state its implications and > effects. I encourage all DDs to not second it until it's been fixed, even > if you agree with the substance.
The options I can see that might end up on the ballot would include: - 4.1.3: override a delegate [1:1] - 4.1.5: position statement about the AGFL [1:1] (Either the same as ftp-master, or the opposite.) - 4.1.5.3: override a foundation document [3:1] The last option is probably unlikely. The problem I see with a position statement is that it's non-binding and that the delegate's decission would still hold. What ftp-master does with that is up to them. I currently see no problem putting it under both of them, and would like to see that clearly in the text of the proposal. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org