Paul Wise <[email protected]> writes: > Would becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any of > these ideas? > > Would not becoming DPL increase the chance that you would work on any of > these ideas?
Well, not becoming DPL means I'd have less time to spend on Debian things than if elected, so, technically, not becoming DPL would severely decrease the chance that I'd work on any of the ideas on your list. But, if we take a hypotethical scenario where I'd have all the time in the world, elected or not - becoming a DPL would not increase the chance of me working on any of the ideas, either. That is to say, being DPL has nothing to do with what I find important, and what I'd like to work on, and work towards. There are some very good ideas on your list, that I find important to push further along (just to name a few: better communication [all kinds of it]; touchscreen-only and mobile support in d-i; d-i being able to highlight platform specific freedom issues; Supersedes; etc), but this is only tied to how much time I have, not to the DPL position itself. It's a mere coincidence that if elected, I'll have more time I can dedicate to Debian and DPL duties. It's the availability of time that increases the chance, not the position. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
