Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>: > My feeling at this stage is that the TC are best placed to make a > decision on the technical merits of the various possible init > replacements and how we might deploy them in Debian. Given that there > is also a political element to this discussion, we could consider a GR > in the light of the TC decision
But what about more simple GR, just like the pool from: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/02/msg00281.html ? > we could consider a GR > in the light of the TC decision; pre-empting that decision would seem > likely to result in a vast pile of duplicated flame/effort. The TC decision about the default init is done. But not about other important things, like requirements/suggestions for maintainers to support alternative inits and so on. I feel that if the GR results on the quoted above pool would be different from TC - that may affect other TC decisions. Ian, would you like to sponsor GR in this form? PS: BTW, Guillem what's a status of this GR-proposal? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
