On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well
> for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice.
Please do not conflate two very different issues. The default choice
has been decided and is not in question at this point. This is about
ensuring that SysV init (among others) is and continues to be a
*possible* choice for a user.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:[email protected]
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) |
| : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
| `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting |
| `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CABpYwDWoejUKybVpJk=qzz1j1d6hozk20g-mrmvfh5gg4bv...@mail.gmail.com
