-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FAOD I assume that this is to be taken as an amendment to Gunnar's,
> which replaces the whole text with your text. (Otherwise it would end
> up in a separate vote.) On that basis,
Yes, I was seconding it as such as well.
> > 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
> > debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances.
> > 2a. Participants may declassify their own material.
> > 2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where
> > consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the
> > material being declassified.
> I do think this is unnecessarily verbose. 2a is entirely redundant
> because obviously if a participant declassifies their own material
> they do so with their own consent, so are permitted to do so under 2b.
No, it isn't. That would be implicit, but 2b requires explicit consent. 2a
makes sure that you don't need to write "I consent to declassify my own parts
I agree it's obvious, but technically 2b would require that if 2a was missing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----