-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:57:21PM +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:53:28 +0100 > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > > > I think it would be best to seek further sponsors for my proposal. > > If you like my version, or would like to see it on the ballot, please > > second it. > > Seconded
I also second this amendment to be on the ballot, even though it will not be my preferred option. Thanks, Bas > > Here it is: > > > > > Formal proposal for amendment to Gunnar's GR: delete all, and replace > > > with: > > > > > > Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private > > > > > > 1. The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005 > > > General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list > > > archives". That General Resolution is hereby repealed. > > > > > > 2. In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for the > > > list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or after > > > this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the > > > declassification process is at least as respecting of the privacy > > > of posters to debian-private as the process set out in the 2005 > > > General Resolution. > > > > > > 3. Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject to > > > the usual consultation processes within the Debian project) to > > > revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification of > > > messages to -private. This includes making measures to make > > > declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate. > > > > > > 4. But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be > > > retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted after > > > the rule change has come into force. > > > > > > 5. In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting made to > > > -private, which explicitly states that it should not be > > > declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit > > > consent). This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3, > > > above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only > > > following consultation, and only with ample notice. > > > > > > 5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary. > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1 > > > > > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX4Vn5AAoJEOPjOSNItQ05vFgH/29lNK5S6bUo1mXZhau74UP5 > > > 8PMCDwEUa7rcYuKefJH4wxvLxQM5FBL8kg72Y4gvr7unqE/sA5HIDsV0pC3EbLZN > > > c2dwmSTrJcxcpST5GI5nfDrUoiP3Y4RMmeLOR97ugHYXxofzakn2XzWMFeoZfChC > > > gu/gb09n6wNkPTvO5YBw2Ve/Soud5TUD1RehK+E2z1d2hvesekRG3k9cWVuxxoj7 > > > ljfBpTuNpsnWzbItyhequ+U57tsyS92FWGgANzpQmO+GhhZpZlFImKlAJN4Vi0Dl > > > jVrDD24EKjKOxIIMxU7448ciITXeTsnfTgylfX9zrzAKfwa7gWPnbWrGNF0E9us= > > > =/vLH > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Thanks, > > Ian. > > > > -- > > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. > > > > If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is > > a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX4pkuAAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6tREP/iUJiJiNYR9v+N4eCoRBABIP PuFurACi7nIiClBecCNXQZmW2UbR0kTR/fc6OgZ4Ujlom+uGZEfKryRYMnNqj1E3 9HJUds7hrdibf6+B2KsnTkGBkfaGrugthBIRivRWa8qXZZk+CMDBGD8NCosvoOR7 5EmxPrM3iWgY698YSr5yleD6Zbi1f/cP6sv8u2hm+DbYXIMFpC3m4+s1tA1fzCwi 20Y5cMdEipb2G8suZZJ5KDQI3h//6UYfQdLr74RyLExqT++UQzXN5JUTwo1kmQ5B Zl+XXSSg+9BFoKMc1nCCrs3oPinkePg3+RLfxFycDR/O4Dt9f42clmvpQ+V3qK3I FwIUc8w8NAUWM23W+8AhOgWsx7oi0VJcPvhgD5MXdEi75tcNV5NxVoLQ/XwSjuVY K1qQLzNtLzmhBrEu8ygSMPgH89vPDBnFY2SegD8Do3ofSrQgprJ21zCB3+KmAMpl hwaqDcF3wuvLLA7b4kUWCCKDsf8U6krIU8RzzedInZChGRKtBuUcCyRewkQVgKST 8VcP4wxBIuVi3JzmZkM/M1+GLPI3D+pfOwPjjUwyZ38UFUIrpeZRD9SpqAPAsMJa QJMttq4sq/j6dTdoMdI315qX/XOobWNarNO4SaTaRnqVQwCr2ccUl0JuPG/N+Gua oWhbAo2p0quDI8x4CHaO =0er0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
