Gunnar Wolf writes ("Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying
debian-private"):
> Ian Jackson dijo [Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:25:49PM +0100]:
> > Oh, I forgot one:
> >
> > > Proponent Is declassification of How might the rules
> > > old posts permissible, for -private be changed
> > > and if so how ? in the future ?
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Status Quo Difficult/unlikely - New GR needed.[3]
> > 2005 GR procedure.
>
> I would argue that the current status quo follows somewhat closely
> what Iain suggests to document: We have had several threads starting
> in private, then somebody requests the permission from A, B and C to
> quote their parts, and moves the discussion to -project or
> wherever. Yes, a GR is needed because what is documented as the will
> of the project is systematically breached.
I'm afraid I don't follow. I agree with everything you say, but I
don't understand why you say it now in response to what you quote,
above.
Do you find my summary (above) inaccurate ?
It seems to me that what you describe with ABC etc., is "difficult"
and is in accorance with the 2005 GR procedure. I haven't explained
the 2005 GR procedure in detail in my summary, of course.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
