On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Even more, from my experience, the availability of an HCL (ie: Hardware > Compatibility List) is mandatory for some vendors to choose Debian. At > $work, I've been told that Debian wouldn't an option for it.
Would this count as a HCL for your $work? https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn > I had thoughts about this, and the only way I see it happening, is by > having some kind of software comparable to Ubuntu's "Checkbox", with > some report on our website. Then through this process, offer vendors the > possibility to put a "Debian compatible" logo on their website. To avoid > trademark issues, this logo *must* be different from the standard Debian > logo. For reference: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Checkbox https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Automation/Checkbox Some related projects: https://linux-hardware.org/ https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe (warning, quite invasive) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smolt_(Linux) https://en.opensuse.org/Smolt http://bugs.debian.org/435058 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Smolt_retirement > Note that I am convince the FSF initiative (I can't remember the ugly > website name, sorry...) is *not* a correct response to this need. We > need our own thing. I guess you mean one of these two: https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/respects-your-freedom https://h-node.org/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
