>>>>> "Judit" == Judit Foglszinger <ur...@riseup.net> writes:
Judit> Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without Judit> needing to additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly Judit> related constitution changes; for example for the change of Judit> mode of voting from email to something not defined. Even if you don't want to move toward some different voting system, do we really want to require a constitutional amendment if say the secretary wanted to move voting to a salsa-authenticated website to make it easier and more accessible to our members? Back when the constitution was passed, email was so obvious for this sort of thing that it wasn't a real limitation. Today, I think there are all sorts of reasons we might prefer a different way to interact with the voting system, and I don't want to need to change the constitution every time we want to make such a change. --Sam