* Sam Hartman <[email protected]> [2022-02-23 16:22]: > Even if you don't want to move toward some different voting system, do > we really want to require a constitutional amendment if say the ...
Sam, I haven't followed the discussion closely, but when I read your ballot I was *immediately* concerned about 3) and 4), which have nothing to do with hiding identities. In fact, if you look at the diff you posted, the biggest changes have nothing to do with the title of the vote. (If 3) and 4) are more important in hidden votes, that needs to be made clearer in the text.) After the "editorial changes" fiasco a few years ago, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to pack unrelated changes into a vote. Yes, maybe they are merely clarifications that everyone agrees with, but if so, why not have a simple follow-up vote later. Someone once said that if a Git commit message contains wording like "Also fix" it should have been two separate commits. That's how I feel about your proposal. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/
