El 04/03/22 a las 12:03, Mattia Rizzolo escribió: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:42:51AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Reaffirm public voting > > ====================== > > > > Since we can either have secret and intransparent voting, or we can have > > open and transparent voting, the project resolves to leave our voting > > system as it is. > > > > Rationale: > > > > The GR proposal for secret voting is silent on implenentation details, > > probably because secret and transparent voting is, well, impossible to > > achieve fully, so this GR is bound to a similar fate as the 'publish > > debian-private' vote, which was voted for and then was never implemented. > > > > A voting system which is transparent only to some, is undemocratic and > > will lead to few people in the know, which is diagonal to Debians goals > > of openness and transparency. > > > > And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, which > > is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the ballot, > > and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. > > > > I'm seeking sponsors for this amendment to the current GR. > > > Assuming you meant this as "this ballot" instead of "this amendment" > (following the new GR flow), I sponsor this. > >
I sponsor this ballot. > If I were to add my thoughts: political GRs don't belong in Debian, > please take them elsewhere. For non-political votes there is no use > for private voting. I think technical is political. Giving freedom to software users is political. And I'd rather say we should avoid GRs involving individuals. Cheeers, -- S
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
