Stefano Rivera dijo [Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:27:45PM +0000]: > Hi Holger (2022.03.04_10:42:51_+0000) > > And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, which > > is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the ballot, > > and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. > > If we were to have such an option on the ballot, my understanding of > constitution 4.2.4 is that we'd have both "keep the status quo" and > "NOTA" as ballot options.
It will make sense if they are ranked almost-equally then :-) Although it is not impossible they will not, which might read as "we are happy / unhappy about this particular GR's background" or something like that.
