"Jonathan Dowland" <j...@debian.org> writes: > On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 12:37 PM BST, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't >> like the term IP=intellectual property... > It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things > since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or > future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs. The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs, though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only large-language models. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
