Gunnar Wolf <gw...@debian.org> wrote on 28/04/2025 at 19:10:35+0200: > Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:46:41AM -0700]: >>>> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't >>>> like the term IP=intellectual property... >> >>> It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things >>> since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or >>> future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs. >> >>The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs, >>though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking >>about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of >>onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only >>large-language models. > > This is an important point, which I subscribe. Since its inception over 60 > years ago, "Artificial Intelligence" is fluffy marketspeak […]
To me, it's actually quite accurate: the intelligence is totally artificial. :D -- PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
