On Mon, 2 Mar 2026, Theodore Tso wrote:
>If the intent is *not* to force the Linux kernel into non-free, the
>wording in [1] needs to be clarified.
Itβs fine if the maintainers revert known slop commits in
debian/patches/ files.
rsyslog will have to go, though. IMHO it already should.
>redefine) "free" to mean "no LLM generated work, regardless of the
>legal copyright impliciations in a particular legal regime", then
No. If the complete corresponding source to the LLM is available
and can be checked (reproducible builds-like), and all of the
licences on all the works are honoured for output produced from
inferencing the model, then itβs fine copyright-wise.
>Just as in last year, I don't think the project as a whole is ready
>for a vote on the GR.
I donβt fully disagree. This is forced by the people actively
trying to allow slop in.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
"Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."
-- Henry Nelson, March 1999
