Hi, On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 16:05 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 09:26 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > > > > > > On the contrary, I think a broad policy without implementation is an > > > open door to chaos. > > > > > > I don't consider reasonable to allow an LLM to push on a repo from > > > which work can be extracted into a distro used by millions and core > > > to a big chunk of the world ecosystem. > > > > > > You are of course entitled to a different opinion. > > > > Then we shouldn't have this policy? > > > > Because we cannot implement it on the vast amount of repositories from > > which work can be extracted into Debian: we do not control upstream > > repositories... > > > > Ansgar > > I was under the impression that we are talking about Debian here.
Yes, and Debian extracts work from many "repo from which work can be extracted into a distro" that are not under Debian's control and for which Debian cannot enforce/implement policies. What is the difference of a LLM pushing into, for example, the python upstream repository vs. a LLM pushing into a packaging repository for python (which also might already include the work the former LLM pushed)? Ansgar
