On 18033 March 1977, Theodore Tso wrote:
I would assert that this kind of assistance is not something that we would want make verboten, and consider as a violation of our Code of Conduct. Fortunately, since the GR hasn't passed, it's currently not a CoC violation. And I would hope most DD's would agree it would not be productive to make this a CoC violation.
*Personally* I have a bad opinion of google and gmail and wonder how anyone can use this thing.
As one of DAMs I dare to say that forbidding this type of usage is simply not enforcable. How should we (or anyone) be able to know an LLM got used in such a way? It is entirely unrealistic. Sure, there is this argument about the social parts about rules and lying to your peers on what you did. But trying to enforce a "you used an LLM to help you write mail" does not work. (Examples of overly useless long mails with bullshit content exists, I know. Those aren't what this is about. Such an LLM vomit is easy to refuse now already even without the rules here.)
-- bye, Joerg
