On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 10:02:49AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > I think there is still a gap among the current ballot options, so I'd > like to propose another one for discussion. > > The intention is to acknowledge the concerns around generative AI and > encourage caution in its use, while avoiding new behavioural or Code of > Conduct rules. Instead, it reaffirms Debian's long-standing principles > of contributor autonomy, personal responsibility, and collaborative > maintenance. > > Comments welcome. If people think this option might be useful to have on > the ballot, I'll formally propose it.
thanks Tobi, I'd second such a proposal, even despite I don't like the
usage of the term "AI". There is no intelligence in these tools.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Friendly reminder, that we are all closer to being climate refugees than
billionaires.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
