On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 07:04:29AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Would you consider replacing the current versions with
human-edited versions of your drafts or notes before you used AI ?
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 08:44:42PM +0200, Tobias Frost a écrit :
It went through multiple iterations before arriving at the current
version, which reflects my own judgment and the outcome I wanted to
achieve.
[…]
an LLM can act as a drafting and language-assistance tool without
replacing my own ideas, reasoning, or responsibility for the final
text.
For that reason, I do not intend to replace the current version
Shameless plug: the proposal is still looking for seconders.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/07/msg00343.html
Hi Tobias,
thank for your kind answer. I really appreciate it.
Your proposal has something that like a lot and that I have not found in
the other ones:
"courtesy to fellow contributors"
This is basically what I tried to acheive with mine, and this is the
reason why I do not use AI in this thread. I think that after proposals
A and C lose to alternatives, it will be easier to keep on working
together if the winning alternative was not drafted to AI, because it
sends the message of "Although I disagree with you, I undestand your
feelings, let's shake hands".
I did not plan to insist, but since you wrote that you miss a second
and since I can be that person…
If you would send me your last draft before AI edition, I would be happy
to propose minor revisions and second it. Maybe the other people who
seconded your ballot would be pleased to the same? Maybe people who
seconded ballot A would second it?
Have a nice week-end,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tooting from work, https://fediscience.org/@charles_plessy
Tooting from home, https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
