Hi,

On 2026-08-14 11:11, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi replying to full quote the mail from Moritz below, since his mail
> got rejected:
> 
> <[email protected]>: host
>     bendel.debian.org[2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002] said: 550 5.7.1
>     <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: Mail
>     appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct
>     HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; please relay via
>     your ISP (inutil.org) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> 
> There is an issue with building neutron on the buildd's due to not
> including the update of python3.13 from trixie-updates, see below:
> 
> The original mail:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 08:58:19AM +0000, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 09:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > > The package FTBFSes on the security buildds, the log is attached.
> > > 
> > > This is *NOT* an issue with Neutron, but with the setup of your build 
> > > host.
> > > It's not including trixie-updates, so it doesn't have the fix for Python
> > > 3.13.
> > > 
> > > In other words, your buildd is running Python 3.13 3.13.5-2+deb13u3 
> > > instead
> > > of 3.13.5-2+deb13u4, and therefore, is affected by the garbage collector 
> > > bug
> > > that appeared on the latest Trixie point release.
> > > 
> > > As a consequence, you'll see random failures like this one:
> > > 
> > > testtools.testresult.real._StringException
> > > 
> > > which is not due to an issue in Neutron, or OpenStack in general.
> > 
> > Makes sense.
> > 
> > > So the question is: how can we get the buildd fixed, and include the fixed
> > > Python 3.13 3.13.5-2+deb13u4 version?
> > 
> > Adding the buildd folks to the thread; could we modify the security buildds
> > to include trixie-updates?

This is now done. Note however that it was done on purpose to avoid 
requiring users to use -updates with -security in their sources.list.  
This could happen if case some package from -security picks-up a 
dependency on a package in -updates. That said the risk is probably very 
low.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected]                     http://aurel32.net

Reply via email to