Hi Jakub, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>I request an adopter for the adequate package. (Note that RFA != > >>O. Talk to me before taking over this package.) > > I wrote this in May 2015. > Then, in May 2016, I orphaned the package. [...] > [...], so there wasn't anything for me to > object.
Ah, sorry, missed that part when I read through the history of this bug report. For a long time, BartM had a bug in his script retitling WNPP bug reports from ITA to O even if they were just RFA beforehand, so I expected this to be an victim of that bug, too, Anyway, in that case I've likely done just the right thing. So thanks for the clarification. :-) I intent to take care of the package under the QA umbrella in case of RC bugs or similar. But if I'd ever take over the package alone respectively its development, I likely have to rewrite tests/run-tests in another language. Testing Perl scripts with Python scripts is definitely not my way of doing such things, especially if TAP is not used. So I'd really prefer if a team would take it over. And I still think that the Lintian team would be the most appropriate team for that. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE