Alexander GQ Gerasiov <[email protected]> writes:

> Package: wnpp
> Followup-For: Bug #1030845
> Owner: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <[email protected]>
>
> Hi there.
>
> What is the status of sbctl right now?
>
> I see all the dependencies are in Debian (there is only 
> golang-github-go-piv-piv-go-dev (>= 2.0) in experimental for now), that's
> great, guys!
>
> As I use sbctl myself I've made an update for your package:
> 1. new upstream version
> 2. bootctl integration to cover the situation, when systemd-boot-efi got
>    updated.
> 3. New installation auto setup.
> 4. Use upstream git tags in gbp.
>
> I do not like current bootctl integration a lot, because it has 2 problems:
> * writing signed files to /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi
> * calling bootctl update directly instead of triggering systemd-boot-signed
> Both moments could be discussed with systemd maintainers.
>
> Also there is tests/ dir in upstream sources, that contains plenty of
> pre-compiled binaries. May be we should exclude them from sources as I'm not
> sure all of them are DFSG-compatible.
>
> Feel free to use my work from https://salsa.debian.org/gq/sbctl
> And do not hesitate to contact me if any help is needed.

What are the main changes compared to:

https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/sbctl

?

I'll take a look, but last time we where waiting on dependencies, but if
I managed to get them all into unstable now, let's revisit 'sbctl'
itself!

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to