Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 05:48:19PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I didn't merge this, as I can't evaluate it. What do you think about >> having 'sbctl' as a package for the binary only, and a new separate >> package 'sbctl-setup' as a package that 'Depends: sbctl' and includes >> your postinst/prerm scripts? That would make me more comfortable, and >> allows simpler testing. > > To avoid inventing a new naming scheme, you could have `sbctl-bin` > and `sbctl`. This would match the scheme used by grub and others.
Great suggestion, thank you. Alas there is some examples of using *-tools or *-utils or even *-util, I think, but at least your idea is better than my approach. Alexander, feel free to push this change if you want, alas I don't have more time to work on this today. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
