On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 03:05, Erinn Clark wrote: > > That is something else I think -women members should address: this > > debian subproject is producing a set of documents which look like it > > cannot be in debian because it is not free software. I didn't even > > realise such things were allowed on alioth. > > This is mostly a matter of my own ignorance. I'm not really sure how to > license it, since I know very little about licensing of websites etc. > Perhaps you can help? I have no intentions of making it "non-free", I'm > just not sure what's appropriate. Suggestions welcome.
http://www.opencontent.org/ and http://creativecommons.org/ are good places to start with making non-programs 'free'. I don't know how they work with Debian, but I use the Open Publications Licence (or have in the past, I just noticed that Open Content now endorses the Creative Commons licences). I note, also, that it's been several days since I checked this folder and someone else may have answered this. :) Jenn V. -- "Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer. My book 'Essential CVS': published by O'Reilly in June 2003. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anthill.echidna.id.au/~jenn/
