On Tue, 26 May 1998, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > Why aren't we using CVS to handle all our static pages? > > All the pages that are maintained by multiple people should > > already be using RCS. If people want to switch to CVS, that's > > fine by me. Personally, I found RCS to be a pain in the neck so > > didn't bother using it when I was the sole maintainer of a page > > (I have copies at home and often scp pages to master). > > It's just a matter of setting it up. A typical `set up once, enjoy for > ever' case (a simple `cvs commit' would upload the changes). > > I'm leraning CVS now to propose it in my job. =)
Yeah, CVS is great, I use it for alot of things.. It's really handy for a directory tree in-sync when multitple people are working on it. cvs commit on your end and a cvs update on the other end Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
