On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:31:32PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > For example, without having to specify it specifically, I think that > anything in the developer's corner and all security notices should have > lower limits, with only one revision for considering it aged, and > perhaps three before it is considered outdated, since this information > might get very important updates. > I actually think the opposite priority is the way to go (except for security). Material in the developers' corner is (mostly) only useful to developers, while something like the main page is read by a lot of people. Thus, the main page would be of high priority and the developer's pages of low priority.
-- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
