Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that I'm not the only one who really dislikes using CVS; has > any thought been made to switching away from CVS to something else > (anything else?)[1]
Search the list archive. I don't think there's a compelling reason to switch yet, but if there is to be a switch: > subversion I feel there's no sense moving from one obsolete centralised architecture to another. > git This works well and also has some CVS compatibility, which could help people who don't upgrade yet. > bazar > mercurial I've not enough recent experience of these two. > darcs Is this the one that depends on GHC which requires GHC to build? (OK, not a problem for debian systems, but I sometimes edit from a non-debian machine.) > tla Better than svn, not as common or popular as git. I've yet to break it, though. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op. Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
