Hi, Laura Arjona Reina <larj...@debian.org> wrote: > El 27/06/17 a las 23:03, Holger Wansing escribió: > > It seems that the implemented logic has never worked correctly (for the > > time > > between x.0 and x.1 release). > > I have attached a patch which would work. > > > > Another approach would need one more entity which is probably not wanted, > > since it makes the whole thing more and more complicated (entity-wise). > > > > I can commit my proposal myself, if you want... > > > > mmm maybe what is wrong is to set <current_initial_release> to 9, and > it should be 9.0? > > I've seen that for the Squeeze cycle we were using 7.0 for > "current_initial_release", and when we released Jessie, we changed to > 8 instead of 8.0:
I didn't check how it was for Squeeze, only checked Jessie. And there it was also set "current_initial_release = 8". Which seems correct since the versioning scheme was changed some day from "x.0" to "x". So the webpage code mentioned here might no longer work correctly now. > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian/release_info.wml?r1=1.75&r2=1.76 > > But I don't know if that change was intentional, to avoid other > problems, or just a small mistake, that I inherited when applied the > changes for the Stretch release... The "current_initial_release" entity is only used in that ../releases/index file, to display the mentioned phrases. So changing it from "9" to "9.0" should be safe. Holger -- ============================================================ Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ ============================================================