Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * This upstream SHM problem is a doozy. This has to be fixed, especially
> for users who use ridiculous window managers like Enlightenment that
> chew threw SHM segments like pirhana through cattle. Fortunately, I
> expect this will fixed soon, although I did a CVS update a few minutes
> ago and didn't see anything that looked like a fix for it to my
> untrained eye. Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] could use some intelligent
> bug reports.
A possible temporary fix might be to put
#define HasShm NO
into the appropriate place in site.def / linux.cf and distribute the
.debs that way until it's fixed upstream. Of course, not doing this
will encourage more people to look for the bug... and I don't know if
XF86 will compile/work without SHM these days...
- M
--
Mark "Monty" Montague | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I don't do Windows(tm)
I'm dubious about any company whose assets can be destroyed by rm -rf
<URL:http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~monty/monty.shtml>
X-PGP-Fingerprint: E4 EA 6D B1 82 46 DB A1 B0 FF 60 B9 F9 5D 5C F7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
