On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 04:52:42PM -0700, Mark Montague wrote:
> A possible temporary fix might be to put
>
> #define HasShm NO
>
> into the appropriate place in site.def / linux.cf and distribute the
> .debs that way until it's fixed upstream. Of course, not doing this
> will encourage more people to look for the bug... and I don't know if
> XF86 will compile/work without SHM these days...
Just thought I would mention (again) that this has been fixed upstream.
Use phase2v10 or later.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Never underestimate the power of human
Debian GNU/Linux | stupidity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Heinlein
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
PGP signature
