On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 16:38 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > $ >conftest.xml > $ xmlto --skip-validation txt conftest.xml > /tmp/conftest.xml:1: parser error : Document is empty > > ^ > /tmp/conftest.xml:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found > > ^ > unable to parse /tmp/conftest.xml > w3m: Can't load /tmp/xmlto.897OOM/conftest.proc. > $
I get the same output but the return code is zero.
That is why the test passes in the macro.
Does Peter get the warning message:
xmlto cannot generate text format, this format skipped
in the configure output? I don't.
I'd like to understand where the difference is.
#!/bin/sh
cat > conftest.xml << "EOF"
EOF
if test "yes" = yes; then
if xmlto --skip-validation txt conftest.xml ; then
have_xmlto_text=yes
echo $?
else
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: xmlto cannot generate text format,
this format skipped"
echo "$as_me: WARNING: xmlto cannot generate text format, this
format skipped";}
fi
fi
The one thing that bugs me about the patch is that the version of
docbook may eventually be
no longer available and this macro must remain backward compatible for
eternity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
