On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:51:46PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El jueves, 6 de octubre de 2005 18:44, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > escribió: > > Author: ender > > Date: 2005-10-06 11:44:49 -0500 (Thu, 06 Oct 2005) > > New Revision: 664 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/debian/changelog > > trunk/debian/control > > Log: > > debian/control: Removed *a lot* (4 KB) of old legacy stuff like Conflicts: > > with packages that are not in stable, some even in oldstable, or others > > even from before. > > The basic rule I took was to remove conditions with non-existent > packages, or > from oldstable. As we only support upgrades from the latest stable version, > it should be fine.
I'm hesitant to allow this one in to the 6.8 packages, but I think it'll be fine. > I think I was overcareful, but I would like a second pair of eyes over > my > changes. There are some other monsters that I would like to kill, but I left > them for a second round: }:-> > > - xlibs (<< 4.3.0) > - libxpm4-dev > - libpam-runtime (something) -> libpam-runtime > - X-things from versions between >> 6.8.0 and << 6.8.2 > - xfonts-cjk, xserver, xfntbig, xfntcyr, xmanpages > - mesag-dev > - xlibs-pic (<< 4.3.0) > - xserver > - *ubuntu* > - rstart* I definitely do not want to remove the current Ubuntu stuff. I explicitly left it in when I was auditing their packaging because I don't want to actively work against sidegrades. A lot of people seem to like to mix and match their ubuntu and Debian stuff, and I don't want to prevent that needlessly. As for the other stuff, I'll have to look more closely at it. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
