On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> You will get interesting segfaults in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (and >> other rdepends of libdrm-nouveau1, if there are any) after this ABI >> break without soname bump. Anyone who has a bright idea what to do >> about that problem? >> > Two solutions, afaict: > Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (<< some-version) > or changing the package name to libdrm-nouveau1with2.6.34abi (well, ok, > not that one, but you get the idea).
I had tried something like this and failed because libtool does not accept non-numeric versions. > There probably aren't any other rdepends at this point since we don't > build the 3d driver yet, so Breaks seems easiest. Yes, we can probably get away with that. Would also be good to bump the version of all symbols in libdrm-nouveau1.symbols to ensure that packages built against the new libdrm are not accidentally used with an older version of libdrm-nouveau1. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zl02z0iw....@turtle.gmx.de