Enrico Zini wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:34:17PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> I just noticed there are no arch specific tags, i.e. for tagging bootloaders. > > This seems to map into something like: > > hardware::arch:i386 > hardware::arch:arm > hardware::arch:... > > Objections?
Would there be enough packages using each of these tags to be worth the upkeep? The silo source-package already has metadata for "Architecture: sparc". It seems to me that most arch-targeted packages aren't going to be things like lilo, they're going to be development packages for PalmOS and the like. I don't know whether that's m68k or arm, but I'm pretty sure it's hardware::embedded. (Boot-managers like lilo would be entitled to an admin::foreign-os tag, if that existed; the traditional "Section: otherosfs" still has no equivalent in debtags...) -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
