On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:22:46AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tuesday 28 November 2006 00:38, Justin B Rye wrote: > > Would there be enough packages using each of these tags to be worth > > the upkeep? > I think so, yes. There are hardware (and therefore arch) specific packages, > "emulators", documentation...! Think of the "I'm new to $arch" usecase :)
Recasting the question, would there be enough drift wrt the Architecture field in the source package to be worth the upkeep? ATM I can't think at any case where the tag would be different to the concept of "there is a binary package on a given arch". If the drift it's not enough I would rather prefer to start thinking at an infrastructure in which external---or more generally, derived---information can be used as tags. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
