On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:02:14PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >I'm pondering devel::lang:posix-sh, or devel::lang:sh-posix : comments? > devel::lang:posix-shell maybe, it reads better.
Deal! Added. > >> made-of::data:pod ⇒ Documentation in perlpod(1) format > >Do we have more than 6/7 packages mostly consisting of POD > >documentation? > As I have understood made-of::data:man these tags don’t mean „consists > mostly of documentation in «foo» format“ but “contains documentation > in «foo» format” – at least the automatic thing suggested me to use > made-of::data:man for mksh, and for libbsd-arc4random-perl the pod > equivalent was just missing, so I suggested it. > Please correct me if I’m wrong and made-of::data:man only applies to > manpage collections. I would say that it's only useful if it applies to packages that mostly consist of manpage collections: otherwise, by debian policy each and every single role::program package should also be made-of::data:man because they're mandated to contain manpages. (...which suggests me a new autotag euristic: if it has files in /bin or /usr/bin, it's likely to be role::program, but this is another topic...) Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
