Enrico Zini dixit: >> >I'm pondering devel::lang:posix-sh, or devel::lang:sh-posix : comments? >> devel::lang:posix-shell maybe, it reads better. > >Deal! Added.
Ok, good. Thanks. >> Please correct me if I’m wrong and made-of::data:man only applies to >> manpage collections. > >I would say that it's only useful if it applies to packages that mostly >consist of manpage collections: otherwise, by debian policy each and >every single role::program package should also be made-of::data:man >because they're mandated to contain manpages. Hmm, interesting. (In fact, there are some, at least in etch, which violate the policy.) Anyway, what's the general opinion regarding made-of::data:man then? Me thinks that, if it applies to programmes with nroff documentation, made-of::data:pod would make sense. >(...which suggests me a new autotag euristic: if it has files in /bin or > /usr/bin, it's likely to be role::program, but this is another topic...) Indeed… //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
