On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 15:39, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've more or less finished the taxonomy [1] for the rating system [2] > for the games in Debian. Before starting to implement stuff on it, I'd > like to have feedback on it, so if you're interested I'm really > interested in your comments. I think you need more options in the violence section. If you have minor violence against humans and realistic optional violence against animals which can be turned down to non-realistic, you can't model that (I think?). The example is completely over the top, of course. It's meant as an example, only. Also, with violence, violent sex and gore, you cover three things which are more or less the same. To be blunt, I can't see this as a resource I am likely to use for myself nor for my nieces and, at some time, kids though. Apart from the recommended age, that is. That is potentially useful imo, but hard to gauge. I do _not_ want to discourage you or anyone else. I just think as you asked for feedback, invested a lot of time & effort in the list and will invest a lot more so negative feedback is potentially useful for you, as well. I would try to run the wiki page by the larger lists, perhaps someone with a usability/rating background will see it and chuck in, as well. Personally, I do not feel qualified to say if the categories are well-chosen. I do _not_ feel qualified to say if that is _not_ the case though, either. I sincerely hope the latter paragraphs do not come across in a bad way, that is _definitely_ not my intention. If they do, please excuse me. English is not my primary language & text lacks social clues like facial expression & intonation. Richard PS: I have been apt-get updating & looking for love daily for some time, now. Any idea on the ETA? The webpage looks very nice, good catch, I'd say :) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
