On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 18:03, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DebTags won't support this. At the beginning I tried to do something > like openrating:physical::coordination-required:low (notice that some > are : and some others are ::) but people complained because it would > be quite complicated and long, so I decided to simplify it. Who complained, specifically? If tags may not have more than two levels, one can get rid of the one extra level, just as well. I suspect this might stem from a perceived threat of tags becoming insanely long, which can easily be prevented by creating guidelines and a pool to choose from. Which is exactly what you are doing, atm. Personally, I think deeper levels are a must. Everything else will result in loss, duplication or weird arrangement of information. > Top Level. As I said, I don't like something like > openrating:physical::.... (: vs :: again) What _is_ the difference between the two? RTFM is a valid answer, I just don't have time atm, but can do so later :) > It would be packaged outside of default debtags as addons anyway (you > can choose whether you want to install them or not, oer whether you > want to make an alternative rating system), because any rating cannot > be done 100% objective. In that case, no one outside of the games team should be able/willing to object, anyway? And yes, people need to be aware that ratings will always be subjective and biased. OTOH, it seems as if you are putting a lot of effort into this, as usual, so I don't see too many false classifications on the horizon. Richard _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
