RE: [Declude.JunkMail] User Interface

[John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)]

The project I was working on 9 months ago is for all purposes dead. My former employer dropped the ball on it. I do have the source code. I know there is at least one person who is using the Imail Web interface for spam controls as well as a test, and I will let him refer to it.   John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] User Interface   Well, you can't always have it all :) Using IMail's Web server would seem like the most global choice, however I have not come across information about it supporting anything besides their own special tags and it doesn't seem like a friendly environment to work in.  Does anyone know if this supports some sort of CGI besides the built in tags?  Designing with IIS though would be a breeze, but not everyone hosts on the same box they do E-mail on, and gaining access to the files would require manual intervention to setup (and a network).  Putting another Web server on the box seems like overkill maybe and won't allow the same degree of flexibility for most, however this might be the most universal approach. I wonder what the majority calling is for.  I'm guessing that most host on the same box as their Web server, and most use IIS.  I suppose that it should be designed in IIS to be as independent as possible from that environment and then ported to a stand-alone Web server if popular enough.  That's something that I would ask my programmer about how best to do.  I don't know how the guy does it, but he literally knows everything and has worked in virtually every environment with every language.  He also makes everyone around him look lazy :) John, I see that you have done some of this stuff, as well as many others.  I'm wondering why with all the interest, it hasn't yet been done?  Also, if Scott is going to do this himself, I'm wondering if there is any estimate as to when it might become available.  I'd hate to spend any time doing this for him to then come out with a solution.  It looks like a daunting task if you try to allow for every possible configuration from global to domain to user.  Maybe it would be better just to write a Hello World script instead and watch some TV with my spare time... Matt John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: I think you hit the nail on the head on the differences on how this is to be done.   Some want to be able to load on the same machine not using IIS, some want IIS.   Some want to be able to load on a different machine not using IIS, some want IIS.   John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com       -----Original Message-----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ISPhuset Nordic ASSent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:09 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] User Interface Sure this would be nice but pls do not use IIS as a webserver for doing    this  it would be muxh better having a standalone thing which we can set the    port for us  self with so many different configs that woule bethe best Benny -----Original Message-----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew BrambleSent: 1. september 2003 17:59To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] User Interface  I'm very interested in this myself, the only thing that is stopping meis knowing what future plans that Scott might have for his configurationfiles and how that might impact the design. I can see that there have been a good deal of other folks designinginterfaces from a search of the archives, however most seem somewhatproprietary to their needs and I would like to see something that wasmore flexible and probably cover other things like Declude Virus as well. Personally, it's my view that my end users generally have no clue aboutspam control, or even that is enabled on their accounts, and giving themconfiguration capabilities would confuse them, or at least somethingbeyond giving them three levels of scoring and the option to turn itoff.  I would want to see something with per-domain and global settings(depending on your version), and maybe extend the product by creatingsomething like digest notification for instance. Does anyone think that there's enough interest in developing such athing(s) for someone to make some money from a reasonably pricedadd-on?  I've got a programmer that could handle this stuff in his sleep    :)  Please chime in. Matt   Jeff Kratka wrote:     There was talk awhile ago about some people creating a web user      interface  for Declude. Did anyone come up with one? Jeff *****************************************************TymeWyse InternetP.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417tel/fax: (541) 839-6027  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]*****************************************************