RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with Statistical Filtering [IMail 8.02]

[Kami Razvan]

Title: Message

Oh Oh...   Interesting... I sure will.   So I am imagining things... has happened before.  I will try to add up the weights and see - I will review the archives now..   so perhaps that explains why the headers show up at the bottom of the header and not at the top like the IP4R tests of IMail.   thanks for the info... that sure was a case of false sense of security.   Regards, Kami -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with Statistical Filtering [IMail 8.02] Hmmm, how is it possible for Declude JunkMail to track the statistical filtering header when statistical filtering does not happen until after Declude has finished its message processing and handed the message back to IMail for delivery?   Search the archives, there was a discussion between Sandy Whiteman and I a few months back about this.   Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: Kami Razvan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with Statistical Filtering [IMail 8.02] Hi;   Just wondering if others have experimented with the Statistical Filtering of IMail.  I am simply sharing what I have seen so far since last week.   I started testing it last week and so far it is showing good results.  Several instances it was enough weight to block a spam that would have otherwise gone through with our filters.   I simply enabled Statistical Filtering and chose Insert Header option.   then added the following to our header filter:   HEADERS          3          CONTAINS          X-IMAIL-SPAM-STATISTICS: 0.9 HEADERS          5          CONTAINS          X-IMAIL-SPAM-STATISTICS: 1.   So far anything with 1 has been spam and several 0.9's are seen that all have been spam.  Basically I have not seen a false positive with the above.  I may increase their weights.. but need more time to test.   Anyone else has any experience?    Regards, Kami