On Sep 12, 2003, at 10:15 PM, Frederick Samarelli wrote:
Matt,
How well does this work.
BODY -5 CONTAINS attachment
I noticed it did not counter weight a photo attachment.
I think what would help this filter and others like it would be if Scott could make it so you could have a line in a filter that read like
BODY PASS CONTAINS attachment; BODY FAIL CONTAINS this_is_a_bad_word
That way you could have rules that counteract a filter as a safety, but they aren't given a value. With the PASS line above if even one case of "attachment;" showed up then the test would pass rather than failing, and at the same time it would be better than the current
BODY -5 CONTAINS attachment;
Because if multiples are in the email then something could easily gain a lot of negative weight which would hurt the effectiveness of the test.
Scott: is this possible to add? Is it easy?
-Josh
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
