Any chance we can seperate fail & unknown into two different tests? via spf we have ?all or -all which are supposed to be treated differently from what I understand.
They are treated differently. An SPF lookup can result in PASS, FAIL, or UNKNOWN. So:
Ideally I would like something like this:
SPFPASS spf pass x -5 0 SPFUNKN spf unknown x 4 0 SPFFAIL spf fail x 8 0
This will work fine.
At this time, though, I would not recommend penalizing for the UNKNOWN response, as most domains do not yet have an SPF record.
However, we plan to soon add a way of letting you force SPF records for domains that don't have them, as well as having a default SPF record. This would allow the UNKNOWN result to be more useful.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
