> While Sniffer is the most effective test on my system I see a lot of > SPAM that Sniffer does not catch that is caught against the SURBL > lists.
Same here. . . I don't see any reason to come out against a secondary content test just because it isn't close to Sniffer on its own. URIBLs are the one reason that I continue to use SpamAssassin in addition to Sniffer, as there's an additional 4-8% of spam that is caught by SA -- thanks overwhelmingly to its URIBL module. I will likely move to your standalone test at some near point. --Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
