|
I have some stats here that suggest otherwise. We only have 5% more
recipients than messages that make it through our gateway, and we only
return permanent errors presently for mail bombing related activities.
This however is a dedicated gateway and not a hosted mail server, so
stats from a hosted mail server would see a slightly higher rate since
most multiple-recipient E-mails are internal to a server. If you are
splitting on a gateway and not splitting internal E-mail, you should
see no increase beyond my numbers. It's a doable solution if one has the need. Matt Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC wrote: Also, realize that on servers processing a large volume of messages per day, the additional IO necessary to create duplicate messages and header files for each specific recipient would be a death sentence...-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue. This is a function of the mail server not Declude. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Delcude has always functioned like this. What declude could do in this case is to duplicate the message for each recipient and write a new header file to each recipient. Not a big issue. Deliver to the one that whitelists and run the spam checks for the others. Kevin Bilbee-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? It's actually more of an issue of how the mail server handles the message. In the case of multiple recipients, since there is only one message file addressed to multiple recipients in the headers, it's either deliver or not deliver unless you rewrite the headers to modify the recipient list. I think I'd rather not have the spam filtering systemalter that. Add to the header, yes. Alter the recipients, no. Also, I have not come across a situation where I wanted to let a message go through to one recipient and not to others, except in the situation of lists which is a whole other topic. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? I would call that a flaw, then, in how Declude processes thewhitelist. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Dave Beckstrom
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Darin Cox
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Dave Beckstrom
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Dave Beckstrom
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw... Darin Cox
