Darin,

You were using different addresses for the lookups. It works the same except that two requests are sent instead of one. If you combine the SBL, CBL(XBL) and NJABL lookups to use the same sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org domain, it will only need to do one lookup even if there are multiple results. Declude will handle the multiple results and skip redundant lookups.

Matt



Darin Cox wrote:
Then what was wrong with my example?

Darin.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Matt <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus

Andy,

What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no advantage either way except that your example is more normalized. I use the variables for a purpose that isn't necessary for most.

Matt



Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Matt:

Are you saying there is an advantage of the dnsbl syntax over using the
standard ip4r syntax:

SPAMHAUS   ip4r    sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org        127.0.0.2   12    0
XBL        ip4r    sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org        127.0.0.4    6    0
BLITZEDALL ip4r    sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org        127.0.0.6    5    0

As long as the test type and test subject is the same (e.g., ip4r
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org), it should do a single lookup an only evaluate the
result several times!?

I've only used the DNSBL syntax when looking up Reverse DNS names, e.g.:

RDNSBL     dnsbl        %REVDNS%.rdns.mydomain.com      *               20
0

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 05:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus

This is how to do it properly.  Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.

SPAMHAUS   dnsbl    %IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org   127.0.0.2   12    0
XBL        dnsbl    %IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org   127.0.0.4    6    0
BLITZEDALL dnsbl    %IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org   127.0.0.6    5    0

Matt



David Sullivan wrote:
Hello Darin,

Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 4:12:49 PM, you wrote:

DC> SBL           ip4r    sbl.spamhaus.org  *  55 0
DC> XBL          ip4r    xbl.spamhaus.org  *  55 0

I was using 127.0.0.2 for SBL and 127.0.0.4 for XBL but Spamhaus lists
.2-4 for SBL and .2-6 for XBL but I guess "*" would work for each and capture all return codes. Right?

DC> SBL-XBL  ip4r    sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org  *  55 0

This doesn't discriminate between the two then, right?

Thanks




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to