What uribl tests are you using and are you getting hits on them - check your logs.. I'm suggesting you may need different tests - the one you are using may have blacklisted you or are dead even...
-Nick MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 Emergency Support 24/7: [email protected] General and Non-Emergency support ticket: https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm ---------------------------------------- From: "IMail Admin" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How effective should Inv-Uribl be? I'm still having trouble with more spam seepage, so I've been looking at my various tests. I noticed that in the past, the Inv-uribl test caught 63-70% of messages, but recently it's only catching 56%. When I look at a lot of the low value spam (messages that barely get classified as spam), they always have an Inv-uribl result of score 0 range clean. Is it just that this test is less effective now? Or have I somehow messed up my configuration? As an aside: I use DL Analyzer to check these results. One this it always does is give the average weight/message and average weight/failed message. Typically, these are scores such as 45 and 46. Just lately I started get results like -131,000 and -136,000. I don't know if this is another sign of something broken in my configuration or if the analyzer program has somehow broken. Thanks. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [email protected], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [email protected], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
